怀疑论视域下的日常语言与文学语言——斯坦利·卡维尔论语言的“在地性”与“生活形式”(2)
http://www.newdu.com 2024/11/30 11:11:12 未知 林云柯 参加讨论
注释： ①安托尼亚·苏莱：《1935年和1937年巴黎会议对维也纳学派的接受，或“纽拉特风格”》，米歇尔·比特博尔、让·伽永编：《法国认识论1830-1970》，北京：商务印书馆，2011年，第31页。 ②康德：《任何一种能够作为科学出现的未来形而上学导论》，北京：商务印书馆，1997年，第43页。 ③卡勒：《结构主义诗学》，北京：中国社会科学出版社，1991年，第16页。 ④卡勒：《结构主义诗学》，第51页。 ⑤Paul Guyer,Kant and the Claims of Knowledge,New York:Cambridge University Press,1987,p.352. ⑥Stanley Cavell,Themes Out of School,Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1988,pp.209-210. ⑦Benson Mates,On the Verification of Statements about Ordinary Language,Inquiry,vol.1,no.1,1958,p.162. ⑧赖尔：《心的概念》，北京：商务印书馆，1992年，第22页。 ⑨赖尔：《心的概念》，第73页。 ⑩Benson Mates,On the Verification of Statements about Ordinary language,Inquiry,vol.1,no.1,1958,p.170. (11)Stanley Cavell,Must We Mean What We Say,New York:Cambridge University Press,2000,pp.4-6. (12)Stanley Cavell,Must We Mean What We Say,p.7. (13)Stanley Cavell,Must We Mean What We Say,pp.13-14. (14)Stanley Cavell,Must We Mean What We Say,pp.9-10. (15)Stanley Cavell,Must We Mean What We Say,p.20. (16)George Picher,The Philosophy of Wittgenstein,NJ:Prentice Hall,1964,p.252. (17)Donald Gustafson,On Pitcher’s Account of Investigations § 43,Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,vol.28,no.2,1967,pp.253-254. (18)Stanley Cavell,The Claim of Reason:Wittgenstein,Skepticism,Morality,and Tragedy,New York:Oxford University Press,1999,p.172. (19)Stanley Cavell,The Claim of Reason:Wittgenstein,Skepticism,Morality,and Tragedy,p.172. (20)Stanley Cavell,The Claim of Reason:Wittgenstein,Skepticism,Morality,and Tragedy,p.178. (21)Stanley Cavell,The Claim of Reason:Wittgenstein,Skepticism,Morality,and Tragedy,p.27. (22)Stanley Cavell,The Claim of Reason:Wittgenstein,Skepticism,Morality,and Tragedy,p.14. (23)Stanley Cavell,The Claim of Reason:Wittgenstein,Skepticism,Morality,and Tragedy,p.29. (24)Stanley Cavell,The Claim of Reason:Wittgenstein,Skepticism,Morality,and Tragedy,p.30. (25)Stanley Cavell,The Claim of Reason:Wittgenstein,Skepticism,Morality,and Tragedy,p.45. (26)J.L.Austin,Philosophy Passage,Oxford:Oxford University Press,1979,p.84. (27)Stanley Cavell,The Claim of Reason:Wittgenstein,Skepticism,Morality,and Tragedy,p.52. (28)Stanley Cavell,The Claim of Reason:Wittgenstein,Skepticism,Morality,and Tragedy,p.53. (29)Stanley Cavell,Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome:The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism,Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1990,p.44. (30)Stanley Cavell,Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome:The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism,p.45. (31)Stanley Cavell,Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome:The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism,p.47. (32)Stanley Cavell,The Sense of Walden,Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1992,p.64. (33)Stanley Cavell,The Sense of Walden,p.8. (34)Stanley Cavell,The Sense of Walden,p.11. (35)享利·戴维·梭罗著，杰弗里·S.克莱默注：《瓦尔登湖》，杜先菊译，上海：华东师范大学出版社，2015年，第95页。 (36)Stanley Cavell,The Sense of Walden,p.15. (37)Russell B.Goodman(ed),Contending with Stanley Cavell.New York:Oxford University Press,2005,p.3. (38)Rosine Kelz,The Non-sovereign Self,Responsibility,and Otherness:Hannah Arendt,Judith Butler,and Stanley Cavell on Moral Philosophy and Political Agency,Hampshire:Palgrave Macmillan,2016,p.65. (39)Peter Dula,Cavell,Companionship,and Christian Theology,New York:Oxford University Press,2011,p.163. (责任编辑：admin) |
- 上一篇：社会转型视域中的新时期文艺理论
- 下一篇：生产性文学批评论纲